Search
But Willi had withdrawn himself. For one thing, he did not approve of such bohemianism as collective bedroom breakfasts. ‘If we were married,’ he complained, ‘it might be all right.’ I laughed at him, and he said: ‘Yes. Laugh. But there’s sense in the old rules. They kept people out of trouble.’ He was annoyed because I laughed, and said that a woman in my position needed extra dignity of behaviour. ‘What position?’ - I was suddenly very angry, because of the trapped feeling women get at such moments. ‘Yes, Anna, but things are different for men and for women. They always have been and they very likely always will be.’ ‘Always have been?’ - inviting him to remember his history. ‘For as long as it matters.’ ‘Matters to you - not to me.’ But we had had this quarrel before; we knew all the phrases either was likely to use - the weakness of women, the property sense of men, women in antiquity, etc., etc., etc., ad nauseam. We knew it was a clash of temperament so profound that no words could make any difference to either of us - the truth was that we shocked each other in our deepest feelings and instincts all the time. So the future professional revolutionary gave me a stiff nod and settled himself on the hotel verandah with his Russian grammars. But he would not be left alone to study for long, for George was already striding up through the gum-trees, looking very serious.
Paul greeted me with: ‘Anna, come and see the lovely things in the kitchen.’ He put his arm around me, and I knew Willi had seen, as I had intended him to, and we walked through the stone-floored passages to the kitchen, which was a large low room at the back of the hotel. The tables were loaded with food, and draped with netting against the flies. Mrs Boothby was there with the cook, and clearly wondering how she had put herself into the position that we were such favoured guests we could wander in and out of the kitchen at will. Paul at once greeted the cook and enquired after his family. Mrs Boothby didn’t like this of course; this was the reason for Paul’s doing it at all. Both the cook and his white employer responded to Paul in the same way - watchful, puzzled, slightly distrustful. For the cook was confused. Not the least of the results of having hundreds and thousands of airforce men in the Colony for five years was that a number of Africans had it brought home to them that it was possible - well, among other things, that a white man could treat a black man as a human being. Mrs Boothby’s cook knew the familiarity of the feudal relationship; he knew the crude brutality of the newer impersonal relationship. But he was now discussing his children with Paul on equal terms. There was a slight hesitation before each of his remarks, the hesitation of disuse, but the man’s natural dignity, usually ignored, carried him quickly into the manner of someone in conversation with an equal. Mrs Boothby listened for a few minutes, then cut it short by saying: ‘If you really want to be of help, Paul, you and Anna can go into the big room and do some decorating.’ She spoke in a tone which was meant to tell Paul that she had understood he had been making fun of her the night before. ‘Certainly,’ Paul said. ‘With pleasure.’ But he made a point of continuing his talk with the cook for a while. This man was unusually good-looking - a strong, well-set middle-aged man with a lively face and eyes; a great many of the Africans in this part of the Colony were poor specimens physically from ill-feeding and disease; but this one lived at the back of the Boothbys’ house in a small cottage with his wife and five children. This was of course against the law, which laid down that black people should not live on white man’s soil. The cottage was poor enough, but twenty times better than the usual African hut. There were flowers and vegetables around it, and chickens and guinea-fowl. I should imagine that he was very well content with his service at the Mashopi hotel.
Search
Bookmarks
You last read
Page
You last bookmarked
Page
Bookmark currentBookmarked!
Page 106
Naomi Alderman November 16th, 2008 at 8:36 pm
‘Yes, Anna, but things are different for men and for women. They always have been and they very likely always will be.’
and then this:
“the truth was that we shocked each other in our deepest feelings and instincts all the time”
This feels so true to me. I have often had quite painful conversations with male friends in which it becomes clear that they have a vastly different view of the differences between men and women to me. The way it’s expressed now is different. There’s a fashion these days for talking about “the evolution of the brain” to justify the status quo. Male friends of mine have come out with stuff like: “men are better at maths because their brains have evolved to deal with the complex geographical problems involved in hunting” ignoring the evidence that women are encouraged in our culture to think that “maths is for men”.
It always feels terribly shocking to me when a friend suddenly tells me, essentially, that they believe that I’m biologically suited to certain roles and not others. I really understand that “trapped feeling women get at such moments”, although expectations on Anna are different.
See all comments by this reader Link to this comment
Lenelle Moïse November 19th, 2008 at 5:51 am
I had a guy friend who once earnestly insisted that romantic relationships between women would never be “balanced” because there was “too much yin” in the dynamic! I was so stunned when he argued this, especially because I had always admired him for being rather sweet and cuddly and nurturing–all those supposed feminine traits. His embodiment of an alternative to traditional masculinity was one of the reasons I sought to befriend him. I was, frankly, more into his yin.
Willi and his lot are described as ’sissy, wet and soft” on UK page 103. Does he know he is perceived this way? Is this why he invests in upholding the gender binary? (I abhor the word “sissy,” by the way) The whole “Women are from Venus, Men are from Mars” thing truly blows my mind. What about the Venus Boys and the Mars Girls, or Venus and Serena Williams for that matter? I really appreciate the term “gender roles.” Gender does feel like a performance sometimes, doesn’t it?
What would Hillary Clinton or Michelle Obama say to a fellow like Willi? Would he have even been able to imagine them? Can Anna imagine them?
See all comments by this reader Link to this comment
Helen Oyeyemi November 17th, 2008 at 8:43 pm
Willi’s telling Anna that ‘things are different for men and for women’ reads to me as a sort of peace settlement…you know, you stay in your ‘agreed’ locus of experience and I’ll stay in mine and thus we’ll shock each other in our deepest feelings and instincts less. Old boy’s actually holding out an olive branch! Ahhh olive branch sexism. Part of the trapped feeling could also be because rejecting the constructed differences makes you the troublemaker and the sex-warmonger and it’s wearying for that always to be the case.
See all comments by this reader Link to this comment