The Notebooks

The Blue Notebook

Online
UK Edition
US Edition

Comments

Previous page
with comments

<<

See all
comments

Go

Next page
with comments

>>

I watched the spiteful anger flash through me.

I thought, sanely, for a moment that during that week he had been relaxed and happy as he was capable of being, so why did I react to that entry with hurt? But I was hurt and miserable, as if the entry cancelled out the week for both of us. I went downstairs and thought of Saul with a woman. I sat watching myself thinking of Saul with a woman. I thought: He’s right to hate me and to prefer other women, I’m hateful. And I began to think longingly of this other woman out there, kind and generous and strong enough to give him what he needed without asking for anything in return.

I remember Mother Sugar and how she ‘taught’ me about the obsessions of jealousy being part homosexuality. But the lesson at the time seemed rather academic, nothing to do with me, Anna. I wondered if I wanted to make love with that woman he was with now.

Then there was a moment of knowledge, I understood I’d gone (*18) right inside his craziness: he was looking for this wise, kind, all-mother figure, who is also sexual playmate and sister; and because I had become part of him, this is what I was looking for too, both for myself, because I needed her, and because I wanted to become her. I understood I could no longer separate myself from Saul, and that frightened me more than I have been frightened. For with my intelligence I knew that this man was repeating a pattern over and over again: courting a woman with his intelligence and sympathy, claiming her emotionally; then, when she began to claim in return, running away. And the better a woman was, the sooner he would begin to run. I knew this with my intelligence, and yet I sat there in my dark room, looking at the hazed wet brilliance of the purple London night sky, longing with my whole being for that mythical woman, longing to be her, but for Saul’s sake.

I found I was lying on the floor, unable to breathe because of the tension in my stomach. I went to the kitchen and drank more whisky, until the anxiety eased a little. I went back to the big room, and tried to get back to myself by seeing Anna, a tiny unimportant figure in the ugly old flat in an ugly decaying house, with the wastes of dark London around her. I could not. I was desperately ashamed, being locked in Anna’s, an unimportant little animal’s terrors. I kept saying to myself: Out there is the world, and I care so little that I haven’t even read the newspapers for a week. I fetched the week’s newspapers, and spread them around me on the floor. During the week things had developed — a war here, a dispute there. It was like missing several instalments of a serial on the films but being able to deduce what had happened in them from inner logic of the story.

The Notebooks

The Blue Notebook

Online
UK Edition
US Edition

Bookmarks

What is this?

You last read
Page

Go

You last bookmarked
Page

Go

Bookmark currentBookmarked!
Page 449

Go

3 Comments

  1. Laura Kipnis December 19th, 2008 at 8:04 am

    Lessing doesn’t offer any context for this idea of Anna’s that it’s “generous and strong” to make no demands on a man. Reading it in 2008, it sounds very “sixties”–the no-strings ideology of the Sexual Revolution soon to come, though I suppose that in any bohemian subculture–Bloomsbury, NY intellectuals of the 30s and 40s–you’d find similar ideas. It was second wave feminism that made all that seem a little self-abnegating for women, mounted the critique of 60s-style sexual freedom as mostly organized for men’s benefit… (Of course now we see the rebellion against the feminist critique in hook-up culture, Girls Gone Wild and so on.)

    Still, why would Anna call this “strength?” I suppose it goes back to the hatred of wives and marriage and the ideal of being a “free woman”–but there’s nothing particularly “free” about her relations with Saul(!) or any of these men. It makes me feel conservative to say it, but the book is more of an indictment of sexual freedom than an advertisement for it, at least if sexual freedom means no-strings sex, or if that telling your lover you don’t want him seeing other women is bourgeois. It’s equally an indictment of intellectuals: Anna endlessly analyzes her feelings, but is impotent when it comes to knowing what to do about them.

  2. Harriet Rubin December 19th, 2008 at 8:58 am

    TGN has, so far, been an indictment of everything: sex, love, relationships, writing, psychotherapy, home decorating, thinking and acting, the will and passivity. Has Lessing left anything out of things to be scrutinized and found wanting? The book’s theme may be that we are overwrought in ascribing meaning, in making categories. in intellectualizing and in not intellectualizing. It may be offering a pean to nihilism, Lessing’s version of Fathers and Sons.

  3. Nona Willis Aronowitz December 26th, 2008 at 6:37 pm

    Anna’s relationship with Saul is a perfect example of what I mentioned in my last blog entry–a woman who is supposedly feminist but exposing and admitting weaknesses and masochism. “Feminist” of course wouldn’t be the right word, since it wasn’t as readily used at the time, but a woman comfortable with casual sex. This book isn’t much different than more recent pieces of pop culture, conservative or not, that paint women as masochistic and vulnerable at their core. I don’t think you sound conservative, Laura…this portrayal of emotional rollercoasters posing as heady passion doesn’t make me want to be sexually free…it’s not quite conscious of itself, as cerebral as Anna is.